Gutenberg and the Book that Changed the World

Gutenberg and the Book that Changed the World artworks

Few moments in history altered the course of human development like this single one.

What came with this first book was a massive leap in technology, and what’s more, accessible information that brought with it a struggle for knowledge, with the powers-that-be on one side and the common man on the other.

The moment of which I speak is the development of the printing press and movable type, which were brought together by Johannes Gutenberg to develop the 42-line Bible.

The 42-Line Bible is more than a book. It is a symbol for human thought. It is the result of hard, tireless work one undergoes when they understand their work to be important. Or they want to make some serious cash.

Gutenberg’s idea lead to the Renascence, the Scientific Revolution and the separation of Church and state as ideas flowed freely and it wasn’t only the monasteries, universities and wealthy who had access to books and knowledge.

The Book

The Beautiful Book

The Gutenberg Bible is the outcome of an orchestral combination of technologies and ideas that came together to produce the first book to be printed with movable, metal type, around 1455. It essentially introduced the printing press as it was to be known for hundreds of years to follow.

A page from Gutenberg's 42-Line Bible. The red and drop cops were added by hand, but all black text was done with the first true movable type.

A page from Gutenberg’s 42-Line Bible. The red and drop cops were added by hand, but all black text was done with the first true movable type.

Prior to the printing press, books were written by hand from a team of scribes, who were unable to keep a consistent visual tone, were prone to mistakes and were damningly slow. A single book was a process that could take months or years, rather than days or weeks.

This all changed with Gutenberg and his run of 180 Bibles.

This was new territory never dared ventured by anyone before — the pages of these books numbered over 1,200 at a size of 307 x 445 mm with a consistent beauty, produced at a relatively remarkable speed.

Visually, the goal was to reflect the beautiful scripts being produced at the hands of scribes of the time, without having to actually write a word, but use exchangeable metal letters. Also found through-out are illustrious drop caps and the opening and closing of sections being done manually by experienced hands, generating an enticing mix of mechanical accuracy and flowing calligraphy.

The same page illustrated by two different artists. Gutenberg sold the books without these illustrations, drop caps and opening paragraphs, leaving it to the purchaser to commission

The same page illustrated by two different artists. Gutenberg sold the books withoutthese illustrations, drop caps and opening paragraphs, leaving it to the purchaser to commission.

The Technology

While the book is a piece of art in itself, it is the technology that was developed so the book could be produced where the true beauty lies.

The Press

Little is known of the press Gutenberg designed. It is surmised that much of his inspiration came from his childhood in one of the world’s busiest wine regions.

Wine presses were large, sturdy pieces of machinery that would lower a plate with great pressure through the turning of a very large screw, which, in effect, is exactly what Gutenberg’s press did.

Below the plate—or platen—was a sliding bench which would hold the inked metal type, with a sheet of paper held in place on the surface. The bench slid into position below the platen, the screw was turned, the platen lowered—giving pressure to the paper against the type evenly and quickly. Then the screw was turned in the opposite direction, raising the platen, then the bench was pulled back, paper removed and the whole process repeated continuously.

It is unknown what Gutenberg's press looked like, but the general principals of it are well known. Pictured here are three different designs -- two illustrations and a third real-world press.

It is unknown what Gutenberg’s press looked like, but the general principals of it are well known. Pictured here are three different designs — two illustrations and a third real-world press.

The Type

If one were to boil this whole process down, it is the system developed to produce the metal type that would prove to be the most innovative. Many of the processes used to print these books generally existed in one form or another, but the metal type is a stroke of genius as nothing like it had existed before.

The way in which these letters were made is a fantastic historical moment. Every variant of each letter was carved and etched from steel at the rate of one, or perhaps two, a day. Let’s consider these the masters.

Each master was then hammered into a strip of brass, leaving behind a perfect impression from which our final letter would eventually find its shape. The strip of brass was slid into a small, two part mold, that would close tightly, leaving a long open cavity with the indented brass at the base.

“… an estimated fifty thousand characters needed to be on hand”

The type-mold that Gutenberg's metal-smith used is what made the process of developing fifty-thousand individual characters manageable.

The type-mold that Gutenberg’s metal-smith used is what made the process of developing fifty-thousand individual characters manageable.

Into this flowed a boiling mixture of various metals that would cool and solidify into the shape of the letter at the base, with a long square shape of a body, all in a matter of a moment.

The mold could then be opened almost as soon as the liquid had been poured and from it could be pulled a single letter cast in metal, ready to be put aside as the mold was reassembled and more liquid-metal poured.

On average, a single page would hold 2,600 characters, so such a quick process was needed to cast the type. With four to six presses being used at once, each with two lock-ups of type on the sliding base, with likely another one or two each being produced at the same time, an estimate of fifty thousand characters needing to be on hand at any one time seems like a conservative number and is thought to be the amount that was the in shop at the time.

The Ink

The ink used by scribes and artists at the time was mostly water based. Sufficient for the wood-block printers as it would be soaked up by the wood, with little excess remaining. But with metal came difficulties — without a porous base into which it could be absorbed, the watery ink would drop onto the paper or become unmanageable pools within the depths of the letters.If the ink were water based, the definitions of the letters would be completely lost as the paper would absorb the ink and bleed.

A much thicker ink was developed from boiled linseed oil and soot, which was dolloped onto a large surface, onto which a large leather ball was rolled to smooth and even it.

Once the ink was smoothed and coated the ball, it was then transferred to the type by rubbing the ball onto the metal letters in a semi-rolling motion, while being held by a handle at the top end.

The texture of the Blackletter is easier to see if we blur the text — notice a lack of major gaps or rivers and the even texture of the word block.

The Pages

The books were printed on two types of stock. The more lavish of which was vellum, a material produced from smoothing calfskin. It is estimated that a staggering 5,000 animals would have to give their hide for the thirty editions that were to use such materials.

Only a small portion were printed on such luxurious materials as the cost of producing them was far greater than almost anyone would be able to afford. The majority of the more expensive of the 180 books found homes in Universities and large Churches, who were comfortably capable of affording such extravagance.

The remainder of the books were printed onto hand-made paper imported from Italy. Gutenberg chose to import his paper from Piedmont, Northern Italy as it had developed a reputation to be the European center of fine paper making.

The paper was made from linen cloth, rather than wood pulp—which came into popular and continued use in the 19th century and is what we’re accustomed with today. The cloth-based paper was strong and could handle the pressures of the press and the passing through many hands.

And from all this came a book

The process became a production line, starting with the compositors who took the type from their homes of organized boxes, put them into a forme, which was loaded onto the tray. The type was inked with a leather ball, dressed with a piece of paper, pushed into position, impressed from the large platen then moved back out of the way, the paper removed, type inked, paper replaced and it all repeated.

This whole process took at least ten—or perhaps twenty—years to come to fruition. Needless to say much work went into these books. The process was refined as research and experimentation was done by Gutenberg and those in his employ, with the end being that the technology he gave to the world didn’t undertake any major changes for at least another 350 years.

I cannot say for certain that I find this book beautiful because of the process that backs it, or for the educational implications it had. Nor is it because of the design and type used throughout. It is simply an immensely important notch on our historical belt, no matter why one adores it.

I can say that it moves me, for whatever reason.

Gallery

All the images I’ve included in this selection are from the
Harry Ransom Center at the University of Texas’ Bible

And industries were started …

The impact that Gutenberg’s 42-line Bible has is fairly evident. The education of the common person became far richer as ideas pertaining to Government, Humanity, Science and Mathematics were brought back from antiquity while new ideas could be spread like never before.

Most, if not all, of those involved in the working of the press’ under Gutenberg’s employment went on to open their own print-houses, some as far away as Italy and France. With many investors seeing how quickly and cheaply these books could be produced, there was no short supply of pockets from which the dollars could be taken.

“What happened to Mr. Gutenberg?
Unfortunately his story takes a tragic turn”

But what of the main player in this story? What happened to Mr. Gutenberg? Unfortunately his story takes a tragic turn. With not enough money to finance his project, he turned to investors. One of whom came to the end of their patience at, literally, the last days of production and closed the shop of Gutenberg, disallowing him entry and access to his equipment. He didn’t oversee the end of his project.

Gutenberg’s assistant became a business partner with the man whom Gutenberg owed a small fortune, finishing the books and selling them, creating a continued flow of financial support for himself, rather than his previous master.

Gutenberg never went on to great riches as he continued his work as a printer, and never met the quality or praise of his lost masterpiece.

Gutenberg wasn’t an artist in the traditional sense. Perhaps he may be better considered an entrepreneurial engineer who served as a conductor of ideas. A conductor to whom a great deal is owed.

Whatever we may consider him to be, without his creative thought and determination, the world in which we live would be a very different place.

REFERENCES & LINKS

The British Library
The British Library has a handy resource on the Gutenberg Bible and in particular the two copies they have in their collection.

The Gutenberg Bible at the Ransom Center
Another mini-site for a copy of the Bible, this time from the Harry Ransom Center at the Universiy of Texas.

Type Foundry
Type Foundry is a blog I stumbled over while doing research for this article and was floored by the quality and depth of the writing. A fantastic blog all about typography and where I found the Type Mold imagery.

Flickr Resources
Aplumb‘s photo of a press similar to Gutenberg’s, used above.


Comments

7 pieces of brilliance put forth by the audience

Gonzalo González Mora
23rd of June, 2010
A lovely hedera

Beautiful post, Alex! I didn’t really know the story behind the press, what a shame it was that he didn’t get what he deserved at the time.

You’re absolutely right about that moment being of the greatest ones in history, I wonder where would mankind be without that invention.

Anyway, keep these posts going, I love the ones with some history on them :)

zolotoy
24th of June, 2010
A lovely hedera

Great story!
Also, it would be interestingly read you post about “Codex Sinaiticus” :)

Alexander Ross Charchar
24th of June, 2010 • www
A loverly hedera

I’m glad you like the history stuff Gonzalo! There’s a lot more coming :) Going to be touching a fair bit on modernism, which is a lot more recent, but a great moment in design history!

I just looked up the Codex Sinaiticus and it is stunning! Thanks for the introduction Zolotoy. It’s amazing how beautiful and even the texture of the words are when you consider they’re done by hand. How beautiful!

Esben Thomsen
27th of June, 2010
A lovely hedera

Lovely article Alex, it is such a shame we don’t have much information about his metrics and sorts, because as you said it is there the real genius of design lies.

According to the Stephen Fry documentary about the Gutenberg bible, he maid 8 different sorts of each letter in different widths just to keep the right margin justified without rivers — imagine that!

He also invented the grid for laying out the page (which we use to this day), notice how the inner margins near the spine have less space than the outer margins! The proportions of the page is often overlooked in relation to the other first inventions he did, I mean today so few understand it, even among professional printers and publishers. Bringhurst have a chapter about this in his “Elements of Typographic Style”, which is the most difficult element to understand.

I talked to a letterpress printer a couple of months ago and he had seen the Gutenberg Bible some years ago. He was utterly amazed that press indent have just kissed the paper without leaving a bite mark. I am not sure if you know this or not, but some believe that this is the most correct thing to do, while others wants a deeper punch into the paper. Not that it is inherited wrong to have a deep punch, but it takes skills to just make it kiss the paper, much fine-tuning is need from the press.

In my eyes Gutenberg was a engineer and designer and he solved a problem.

Alexander Ross Charchar
27th of June, 2010 • www
A loverly hedera

Oh there is so much I want to respond to in your comment Esben!

It’s a great documentary and that was one of the facts that blew me away — it makes sense, as the texture of Gurenberg’s pages are so even that it’s the only way it could be done! It also shows something that I really admire; Gutenberg and those he worked with put in an extreme amount of effort — effort that payed off in spades in the end.

And the grid you talk of is something that I covered for an upcoming retinart article! I was actually going over it to make sure everything is ok with it when I got the notification of your comment! ha!

It’s an article that looks at the page canon that Gutuenberg used and how four designers through history rediscovered it independently of one another! It’s insane! Four people came to the same conclusion of how to layout a page ‘perfectly’, even though they weren’t directly influenced by one another in a MAJOR way, hundreds of years apart. I also did up a few quick layouts showing how it could be used in a contemporary way.

It’s probably my favorite article written so far (except for a geometry one that’s also coming up!)

And marrying into a printing family, who helped me obtain my Windmill, I’ve been told many times that the deep impression that I so love is a real nightmare to most printers. But I actually didn’t realise that Gutenberg had achieved just a light kiss with his machine! He would have had to measure and adjust his presses over and over until he got it just right!

Though the price of the paper he was using was probably so high that damaging it with his metal type wouldn’t have been acceptable. Not to mention he was also trying to have books that looked as if they could have been done by scribes and their quills (another reason for multiple widths for each letter?).

Great comments, thanks as always :)

Esben Thomsen
27th of June, 2010
A lovely hedera

and your follow up comment just shows the huge challenges he really stood up against. Often Gutenberg’s invention is mentioned to his press, but the fine-tuning of the press is really a key issue no one mentions.

The page proportions is bolsters his genius and makes modern day printing in the shames.

I could easily mention other elements he had to take into consideration, such as paper weight (not leaving the indent on the opposite side of the page and get somewhat consistent weight), the grain of the paper and which direction they run and why he choose linen cloth which keeps its fibre elasticity for centuries.

The indent in the paper is properly difficult to archive, whether it is deep or light and both can be damaging. Too deep and your sorts get destroyed, too light and the ink is uneven.

The task Gutenberg stood against is overwhelming for me to understand.

Alexander Ross Charchar
28th of June, 2010 • www
A loverly hedera

I think it’s because of all those elements that he was a conductor of engineering — much like the sort that stands in front of a musical ensemble and controls and guides so many elements to come to a marvelous end, so did Gutenberg..

the more i read about Gutenberg the lazier I felt… when I think of my current situation and what I spend my days and nights doing i can’t help but wonder what im press and bible will be in another ten or twenty or thirty years.. heh :\

Shall you delight, entertain & enlighten
us with your own thoughts?

By what name
are you known?

By what route shall an email
touch your thoughts?

And where is the website
that your playground lies?

With what name do you express
140 at a time with twitter?

Will you lend me your
thoughts with a comment?





May I please remember
these details?

thank-you dearly

Shall I send message to notify
you of new thoughts?

Hidden! Hidden! Hidden! Hidden! Hidden!
Hidden!Hidden!